Meanwhile, certain Anchor users criticized the development on the proposal's official discussion forum. "Anchor's competitive advantage is a STABLE deposit rate. If we move to active performance, we give up that advantage," wrote user pseudonym "fulltimecrypto." Other users were more optimistic. "We're big enough now. It's time to grow up a bit and I realize that XNUMX% in stables is overkill," DefiantProtocol said. "Cutting the rate in half would not result in significant capital flight."