Looking for the best cloud backup service for your photos? Amazon and Google have two of the best tools for your precious images, so who wins in the great ``Google Photos vs Amazon Photos'' debate? Backing up your photos to the cloud is a good idea. In addition to keeping your images safely stored online, without the risk of hard drive hardware failure, it also means you can easily access your entire library, anytime, anywhere, from almost any device connected to the Web. Google Photos and Amazon Photos make it easy to sync, download, and manage your image collection across multiple devices. They also offer useful search and filter tools to help you find specific snaps, as well as convenient sharing options to send snaps to your friends and family. You can even order physical prints of your favorite photos, making the comparison between Google Photos and Amazon Photos very competitive. So which service is right for you? While there is a lot of overlap between the features that Google Photos and Amazon Photos offer, there are also some key differences. Amazon Photos, for example, offers unlimited full-resolution photo storage for Prime subscribers, while Google offers 15GB of free storage before you have to pay for a Google One plan. Amazon Photos integrates seamlessly with Fire devices. TV and Echo Show, so you can easily select new backgrounds, while Google Photos offers a full suite of automated editing tools and smart sorting suggestions to get the most out of your library. While you can't go wrong with your Google Photos vs. Amazon Photos decision, the guide below is worth reading to find out which service is best suited for your photo backup needs. After all, you don't want to spend hours, or even days, downloading your collection of images, only to discover that the platform you choose doesn't have a feature that's essential for your needs. Don't know how to choose between the two? The following guide covers the ins and outs of Amazon Photos and Google Photos, for every type of user, from price and storage capacity to editing tools and organization options. So whether you're backing up from a smartphone, PC, Mac, or even a social network, this guide will help you choose the right cloud backup provider for your photos. It's time to dive into our deep face-to-face meeting between Google Photos and Amazon Photos...
Google Photos vs Amazon Photos: price and storage capacity
Amazon Photos and Google Photos offer a first installment of free photo storage: anyone with an Amazon account gets 5GB of cloud capacity, while anyone with a Google account gets a more generous 15GB. As of June 1, 2021, Google is no longer offering unlimited free storage for "high-quality" photos: "original" and compressed photos now count toward your total. Therefore, whichever service you choose to use, you will need to pay for additional space once you reach the free limit. With Google Photos, that means buying a Google One subscription to increase your storage capacity across all Google products. Plans start at US$1.99 / €1.59 per month for 100GB of cloud space and go up to US$10 / €7.99 per month for 2TB.
(Image credit: Future) Amazon's approach is a bit different: Subscribers to the company's Prime service get unlimited full-resolution photo storage for free as part of their plan (plus 5GB for video). For a one-time monthly fee of US$12,99 / €7,99, you can use Amazon's overnight delivery service, access its extensive library of streaming video content, and download as many images as you like on Amazon Photos, without any compression. You can also increase the storage capacity of your Amazon account without a Prime subscription. Plans start at US$1.99 / €1.49 per month for 100GB. This option will also be useful for those who plan to store videos in the cloud. The right plan for you will depend on how many photos you plan to upload and whether you'll be using the extra benefits of a Prime plan. If your photo collection is relatively small and you don't need the extra features, the basic 100GB plans for both services are simple and affordable. But if your library is large and you intend to store thousands of images, and you'll be using Prime's delivery and streaming features, Amazon Photos offers a better value.
Google Photos vs Amazon Photos: downloads and syncing
Both services offer comparable cross-platform backup options. Amazon Photos and Google Photos are accessible from any consumer web browser. Each also offers dedicated apps for desktop, Android, and iOS devices. The Amazon Photos app is also available for Fire TV and Fire tablets. There is little choice between the two when it comes to image upload and sync functionality. Accessing either platform via the web allows you to download folders of photos directly from your hard drive, while installing their respective apps allows you to automatically save snapshots from your device, be it a laptop, tablet or phone. intelligent. Both apps let you restrict mobile downloads to Wi-Fi, to save on data usage, and both also make it easy to download synced files to your device's Camera Roll for offline storage.
(Image credit: Future) One of the best things about the Google Photos toolkit is the ability to save snapshots directly from Facebook, as part of the data transfer project. Look for ``Upload a copy of your photos or videos'' in your Facebook account settings and you can copy your shared snaps directly to Google Photos (for more detailed instructions, see our Google Photos backup guide). This option is not available for Amazon Photos. On the other hand, Amazon Photos is designed to integrate with Alexa-enabled devices. If you have a Fire TV device, for example, you can easily change your background using clips stored in your cloud library. The photo backup platform that best suits your needs will largely depend on where your photos are currently stored and what devices you plan to sync with your library. Google and Android smartphone users are likely to find Google Photos more suitable, while those who invested in Amazon's ecosystem of devices should reap the benefits of saving their snaps to Amazon Photos. Those using Apple hardware will want to weigh the two options. Google Photos and Amazon Photos offer simple editing tools through their apps and web platforms. Rather than advanced settings, they're designed to help you quickly adjust levels, apply filters, and change clipping. Its interface isn't quite as slick, but Amazon Photos offers several editing tools that Google's photo backup platform doesn't, including the ability to add text overlays and apply effects. It also has a larger range of filters, as well as a wider range of settings. The ability to change shadows, highlights, gamma, clarity, and more beats the simple light, color, and pop sliders found in Google Photos.
(Image credit: Future) What really sets Google Photos apart when it comes to editing is its automatic adjustments. Google Photos sometimes offers edits to your photos. Otherwise, open any image, click the icon
Editar '' y encontrará una opción Auto '' that always brings out the best in images, sensitively adjusting color, brightness, and brightness. Other levels for a fantastic effect. In fact, neither Google Photos nor Amazon Photos are a real replacement for the best photo editors or the best photo editing apps. But if you're looking for a photo backup platform that can also help you improve your images quickly and easily, Google Photos has the best.
Google Photos vs Amazon Photos: smart search
Google Photos and Amazon Photos offer intelligent search tools that make it easy to keep track of photos in your cloud photo library. Each backup service uses AI-powered object recognition to help you locate specific shots. Type a term into the toolbar of either service, like ``dog'', and you'll find both are scary when detecting content in your image collection. Distinctive subjects seem to be picked up the most by Amazon Photos and Google Photos, though each surprisingly manages to find background elements like trees, roads, and hills as well.
(Image credit: Future) Google Photos and Amazon Photos can also identify human faces in your photos very effectively. Taking a little time to tag photos can help improve results. Before long, you'll find that new portraits synced to either platform will be automatically sorted by their subject name. While it's hard to measure objectively, Google Photos seems a bit more effective at matching faces. Again, the effectiveness of each service is influenced by how long you have shared, tagged, and downloaded secondary images and data. If you're a long-time user of Google services, you'll probably find that you've already learned your friends' faces.
Google Photos vs Amazon Photos: organization
If you have a large library of images to save online, the sorting options will be crucial to your user experience. In addition to automatically categorizing snapshots of people and places, Google Photos and Amazon Photos let you sort sets of images into an unlimited number of custom albums. On paper, there isn't much to choose between the two. In practice, Google Photos turns out to be smarter when it comes to organization: it will offer smart albums based on the data and dates of your photos, which may indicate a holiday, for example, and format them into attractive folders with location tags. and travel maps. Like Amazon Photos, Google Photos also includes a "Favorites" feature, which allows you to highlight any snapshot you want outside of a specific album. Unlike Amazon Photos, the feature is also available on the web.
Google Photos vs Amazon Photos: Sharing Options
Yes...