El
Management Body of the State Civil Administration, also known as GACE, is a major institute created to improve administrative services and ensure governance sustainability. The creation of the State Civil Administration Management Body is an initiative promoted by the State Government to meet its objectives of improving the management of the Civil Administration. The policies implemented by the Management Body of the State Civil Administration aim to improve the efficiency and competitiveness of the
state management. In addition, the Management Body of the State Civil Administration promotes innovation, modernization and citizen participation in the governance of the State. However, since GACE's constitution, the government has received criticism and harsh criticism from various sectors of society. These criticisms were directed mainly at the way in which the State Civil Administration Management Body has structured its policies and programs, alleging that the expected results have not been as expected. This has led to a frantic search for solutions to improve the governability of the State by the most affected citizens and social sectors. At present, the
GACE Forum It has brought together various social actors to discuss the management problems of the State Civil Administration. These social actors have unified efforts to achieve a more balanced and sustainable management for the State Civil Administration.
Popular opposition to the State Civil Administration Management Body
In recent months, a strong popular opposition has emerged in the state against the Corps of
Management of the State Civil Administration, which has been supported by different social actors. Although the GACE Forum has tried to address the problems detected and propose solutions to them, many citizens have expressed their disagreement with the structure of the policy proposed by the State Civil Administration Management Body. The sectors against GACE alleged that the State Civil Administration Management Body is not meeting their needs and is not promoting real and effective governance in the State. As proof of this, numerous examples were presented of situations where a lack of action by GACE has had negative effects on citizens. These effects have translated into a lack of development in many areas and a lack of real solutions to the problems identified by the GACE Forum. Many citizens have also alleged that the State Civil Administration Management Body is being controlled by irresponsible interest groups. This has created a situation of opposition to GACE in which citizens believe that the Corps is not paying due attention to the provision of services that citizens have the right to expect.
Conclusions
The opposition to the Management Body of the State Civil Administration has been a topic of great interest for the citizens of the State. This opposition has been manifested mainly in the debates in the GACE Forum, where problems in the management of the State Civil Administration have been identified and solutions have been proposed to improve the decision-making process and the sustainability of the programs. After several months have passed since the constitution of GACE, it can be said that the State Civil Administration Management Body has shown positive results in its work, having improved services in many areas. In addition, GACE has also achieved greater citizen participation in decision-making, which has helped promote trust and responsibility among citizens. However, it should be noted that there is still a long way to go to achieve a better management system for the State Civil Administration. That is why the GACE Forum must continue to address the problems detected in order to achieve a balance between government and citizens and guarantee an improvement in public services.